mirror of
https://github.com/fallenbagel/jellyseerr.git
synced 2025-12-24 02:39:18 -05:00
docs: add AI assistance notice (#1917)
* docs: add AI assistance notice * docs: add TODO item for AI disclosure
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,6 +2,45 @@
|
||||
|
||||
All help is welcome and greatly appreciated! If you would like to contribute to the project, the following instructions should get you started...
|
||||
|
||||
## AI Assistance Notice
|
||||
|
||||
> [!IMPORTANT]
|
||||
>
|
||||
> If you are using **any kind of AI assistance** to contribute to Jellyseerr,
|
||||
> it must be disclosed in the pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
If you are using any kind of AI assistance while contributing to Jellyseerr,
|
||||
**this must be disclosed in the pull request**, along with the extent to
|
||||
which AI assistance was used (e.g. docs only vs. code generation).
|
||||
If PR responses are being generated by an AI, disclose that as well.
|
||||
As a small exception, trivial tab-completion doesn't need to be disclosed,
|
||||
so long as it is limited to single keywords or short phrases.
|
||||
|
||||
An example disclosure:
|
||||
|
||||
> This PR was written primarily by Claude Code.
|
||||
|
||||
Or a more detailed disclosure:
|
||||
|
||||
> I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase but the solution
|
||||
> was fully authored manually by myself.
|
||||
|
||||
Failure to disclose this is first and foremost rude to the human operators
|
||||
on the other end of the pull request, but it also makes it difficult to
|
||||
determine how much scrutiny to apply to the contribution.
|
||||
|
||||
In a perfect world, AI assistance would produce equal or higher quality
|
||||
work than any human. That isn't the world we live in today, and in most cases
|
||||
it's generating slop. I say this despite being a fan of and using them
|
||||
successfully myself (with heavy supervision)!
|
||||
|
||||
When using AI assistance, we expect contributors to understand the code
|
||||
that is produced and be able to answer critical questions about it. It
|
||||
isn't a maintainers job to review a PR so broken that it requires
|
||||
significant rework to be acceptable.
|
||||
|
||||
Please be respectful to maintainers and disclose AI assistance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Development
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools Required
|
||||
@@ -158,4 +197,4 @@ DB_TYPE="postgres" DB_USER=postgres DB_PASS=postgres pnpm migration:generate ser
|
||||
|
||||
## Attribution
|
||||
|
||||
This contribution guide was inspired by the [Next.js](https://github.com/vercel/next.js), [Radarr](https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr), and [Overseerr](https://github.com/sct/Overseerr) contribution guides.
|
||||
This contribution guide was inspired by the [Next.js](https://github.com/vercel/next.js), [Radarr](https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr), [Overseerr](https://github.com/sct/Overseerr) and [Ghostty](https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty) contribution guides.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user